Yes, for close to $5k it should be the fastest thing around.! Whew. Also, wake me when you have one in your possession to test and aren't just rehashing nVidia's PR pages, courtesy of Puget Sound. Looks like you are using scalper's pricing instead of the official MSRPs.:oops: Anyone would pay $4k for an AIB 3090 is nuts, imo. MSRPs for 3090 AIBs is no more than ~$2k. Waltc3 said:$650 "more".MSRP for the 3090FE is $1599, according to nVidia. Other applications can also benefit from the new card, but actual advantages heavily depend on exact workloads. Evidently, with the massive increase in GPU horsepower versus its predecessor, the card brings its biggest gains in GPU rendering benchmarks as well as in DaVinci Resolve.
Quadro rtx 8000 professional#
Unsurprisingly, Puget found the Nvidia RTX A6000 48GB is the fastest professional graphics card they have ever tested. Nonetheless, the new Nvidia RTX A6000 64GB managed to show some speed gains compared to the predecessor in these two apps as well. Yet, both programs are CPU bottlenecked in many cases, which means that any decent graphics processor (and not necessarily a professional one) is usually enough for both suites. Like other modern professional graphics applications, Adobe After Effects and Adobe Photoshop can take advantage of GPUs. In both cases, the Nvidia RTX A6000 48GB offers tangible performance advantages compared to its predecessor, but its advantages look even more serious when the board is compared to graphics cards released several years ago.
Quadro rtx 8000 pro#
Modern video editing and color correction applications, such as DaVinci Resolve 16.2.8 and Adobe Premiere Pro 14.8, can also accelerate some of the tasks using GPUs. Still, the new RTX A6000 48GB is tangibly faster than any other professional graphics card in GPU-accelerated rendering workloads. That said, it is not surprising that the Nvidia RTX A6000 48GB outperformed its predecessor by 46.6% ~ 92.2% in all four rendering benchmarks ran by Puget.Įvidently, V-Ray 5 scales better with the increase of GPU horsepower and onboard memory capacity, whereas Redshift 3 is not that good. Since we are talking about graphics rendering, the same programs also benefit from GPU capabilities. Not all professional workloads require enormous onboard memory capacity, but GPU-accelerated rendering applications benefit greatly, especially when it comes to large scenes. Meanwhile, the previous generation flagship - the Quadro RTX 8000 48GB (TU102 with 4,608 CUDA cores) - is still priced at $5,000 ~ $5,500. Technically, the Nvidia RTX A6000 48GB ($4,650) is the successor of the Quadro RTX 6000 24GB (~$4,000), even though the latter has only half the memory.
Quadro rtx 8000 full#
Up to 92% FasterĪs far as performance is concerned (read the full review at Puget's website), the GeForce RTX 3090 might get close to the Nvidia RTX A6000 48GB, but since the former is not a workstation-grade graphics card, Puget decided to compare the new professional board to Nvidia's Quadro RTX 6000 24GB (TU102 with 4,608 CUDA cores). Pricing has not been disclosed.The combination of the Nvidia GeForce RTX A6000 drivers, 48GB of GDDR6, a slightly different GPU configuration, Quadro Sync support, enhanced reliability, a different display output configuration, and a blower-type cooler (which is preferable for multi-GPU configurations) create a solution that costs $4,650, which is considerably higher than a $1,500 MSRP of the standard GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition, though some custom RTX 3090's push the needle as high as $4,000. The Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive are presently for sale to commercial customers, with a public release expected sometime soon. The memory clock has also received a small hit of 7% to bring it from 14 Gbps to 13 Gbps.Īll jokes aside, these cards still need air blown across the heat spreaders by system fans, like the ones in leaf blowers – ok, so I lied about setting the jokes aside – that makes them server rack only, so PNY has removed their usual display ports.ĭespite potentially increased operating temperatures, PNY is offering its regular three-year limited warranty. The boost clock has been lowered by 8% down to a still very respectable 1,620 MHz, and the base clocks have been dropped by about 12%. I've never heard of 250W being passively cooled within a standard 2-slot form factor, but there's a first time for everything. PNY claims the two new GPUs, which share a core count and boost clock, only sacrifice a little bit of performance to achieve a passively coolable 250W TDP. At $6,000 and $4,000 respectively, that's an expensive pair of space heaters. A hot potato of a GPU: PNY has announced passively cooled versions of the Nvidia Quadro RTX 80, which are two of Nvidia's largest and hottest cards with 4,608 CUDA cores and 295W TDPs.
0 kommentar(er)
